TB: The 50+1 rule - what can we learn from the Germans?

As part of my full-time education, I was given the opportunity to create an extended project, wherein I could write a dissertation on any subject of my choosing. I chose to focus my spare time on the viability of Germany’s specific ownership rules potentially being implemented in professional football in England. With Hereford’s demise being my inspiration for this little project, I thought here may be as good a place as any to explain my conclusions from my research.


The 50+1 rule is implemented in the top two tiers of German football and essentially means that the supporters’ trusts and societies must retain 50% of a club’s shares plus one more. This way, supporters retain the majority of voting rights and as such, can dictate ticket prices and merchandise costs. The consequence of this is that German football has attendances far higher than in England and the atmosphere in grounds smashes the London stadium out of the park - in this case the Queen Elizabeth Olympic.

So far so good, but there are cracks beneath the surface. Prior to the 50+1 rule, all clubs with the exception of works teams (Bayer Leverkusen and Wolfsburg) were owned by member associations anyway. The introduction of a 50+1 rule didn’t therefore force any immediate change in regulations, instead only providing loopholes to pre-existing works teams. In contrast, before commercialisation in the late 1980s and the birth of the Premier League in 1992, football clubs in England were owned by local businessman who it was always presumed acted in the supporters’ best interests as they too were supporters of the club. However, this mutual, unwritten understanding was hypothetically torn up as a wealthy investors saw the commercial opportunities football clubs could offer compared to the local businessman’s finite amounts of wealth. Fan Ownership has never been seen in English football as an ownership model to aspire towards.

In England, fan ownership has taken over only as phoenix clubs, or to bail out teams in financial difficulty. Currently in the football league, only Exeter City, Newport County, Wycombe Wanderers and AFC Wimbledon are fan owned, and all have notable financial restrictions compared to other clubs and are unlikely to reach the second tier in the near future. Meanwhile, any potential introduction of the 50+1 rule would mean all current owners would have to become minority shareholders and supporters’ trusts must be financially strong enough to buy them out. Plus, the aforementioned owners would have to be willing to vote for such a move at FA and EFL AGM’s.

In short, we can conclude that the 50+1 rule can’t be translated into English football, but there are many attributes we can introduce into English football which may not cause such uproar among CEOs. For example, each club could include a supporters trust representative on the board of directors who acts as a link between fans and the board. In clubs such as Charlton and Blackpool at the moment, I personally believe clubs could have benefited from having a communication barrier replaced by an open communication between the decision makers and the fans who ultimately want to see the best for the club. Or perhaps, the FA could take a more proactive role in ensuring fit and proper governance, appointing regional officials whose job it is to ensure fans are not being marginalised by club owners or that those owners are acting recklessly. Going above and beyond the current ‘fit and proper’ test which, as we Bulls fans are aware of, simply doesn’t work.

In Sweden, the 50+1 rule has been implemented successfully, replicating the rule in Germany completely. However, football doesn’t have the same history and precedent in Sweden and so acted as a far softer ground for implementation. In fact, when the Swedish FA sought to manipulate the laws to open up new commercial ventures, they were rebuked by protesting supporters. A small victory. Around the world, in developing countries, football is capable of being built up as a sustainable game owned and governed by the supporters who have clubs’ best interests at heart. Whilst in England, this may not be possible, there is a ripe opportunity for reforming fan engagement in the beautiful game, before disillusionment, not felt since the Glazer takeover in Manchester, becomes widespread.
Football should change its ways, before the supporters change theirs.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A True gauge of Happiness

Image
This article has been written having just read this news article . - BREAK FOR READING FULL ARTICLE OR ENOUGH TO GET THE GENERAL GIST.- This article amuses me. I'm curious how this survey of 1,000 people in each country can declare Norway remarkably perky and the Central African Republic down. It's certainly not wealth although it's easy to think so. The Danes pay ridiculous taxes with the wealthy paying up to 52% on their income. Mali meanwhile offers a choice of 30% or 3%. This rather bizarre system doesn't count for happiness though as they continue struggle on the happiness list. Instead it must stem from emotional feelings of satisfaction. This is Hygge. I'm not going to tell you how to pronounce as despite much debate, this is a blog not a vlog instead. Instead you can look at the picture. The point is if we all look after ourselves with small acts of self satisfaction, we would be better in the long term. Or at least happier. On the other hand...
Read more

Final year

Last semester, I occasionally thought about the students smoking in a huddle outside the library in mid October, puffing away late into the night, griping about a dissertation suffocating them into a state of self-pity. In that moment I felt detached, swept briefly away into a world I didn't understand yet seemingly expected myself to empathise with. The truth is that I did empathise, but only in the ludicrous, vague feeling of emptiness that accompanies anyone leaving the library late at night - the feeling that you have morphed into barely a husk of limp muscle, stretched excessively over a brain drained by the lateness of the hour. This is a final year. A final year is when the bedroom, once full of old family photos in a desperate attempt to project personality and emotion onto the walls, now exists barely for sleeping. Now campus is life’s centre, superseding all else. Writing this, I am once again ensconced within the horrendous grey of the main library before term has even b...
Read more

The Power of Identity

Image
This article is about vexillology (study of flags) Flags are a symbol of identity and can also act as a form of identification and also decoration. They carry pride and patriotism whilst being a form of recognition for a belief or way of life. So in such a troublesome time, is the flag the issue or is it the inaccurate interpretations by of the flag's intended connotations. Let's investigate... Flags were originated for battle so the oncoming armies could identify each other. It was for a simple purpose of recognition. Only during the development of maritime exploration did flags become necessary to identify nationalities. It was only in the late 18th century were flags officially produced with nationalist sentiment and by the mid 19th century, every sovereign state had its own flag. However the controversy of flags tends to predominantly come from colonial history and quests for independence. Two of the most recent examples are the confederat...
Read more